Solutions · Engineering Firms

Your PEs should be engineering.
Not drafting.

OSP consulting and engineering firms are turning away fiber design work because senior engineers are buried in first-pass routing, take-offs, and sheet production. MACRILON is white-label design capacity: the engine produces the planning-grade package; your licensed engineers review, refine, and seal — under your name.

What is slowing your build?

Backlog exceeds bench

The fiber build wave has every firm quoting longer lead times. Each design that waits is revenue deferred — and a client tempted to look elsewhere. Hiring more OSP designers is slow, expensive, and hard to unwind when the wave passes.

Low-margin hours eat high-value people

The first 80% of a subdivision design — routing, home counts, footage take-offs, BOM assembly, sheet production — is mechanical. Billing a PE's hours on it caps both your margin and your throughput.

Every client has their own standards

Split ratios, spare-capacity rules, preferred construction methods — encoding each client's playbook into junior staff takes months and walks out the door with turnover.

Tools that automate also commoditize

You need leverage that stays behind your brand — not a platform that turns your deliverable into a commodity your clients can buy directly.

What MACRILON delivers

  • White-label first-pass packages — workbook, costed BOM, plan sheets on aerials, CAD (DWG/DXF), and routed GIS delivered to your team for review; your firm remains the engineer of record and your PE seals what goes out.
  • A day per boundary instead of weeks — quote shorter lead times and take on the volume you're currently declining, without adding headcount.
  • Your redlines become the engine's rules — corrections your engineers make are captured as structured feedback and applied to every subsequent design for that client; each client's playbook is encoded once, not re-taught.
  • A documented review trail — per-design build-readiness scoring tells your reviewer exactly where to look, and the review itself is auditable — supporting, never replacing, professional judgment.
  • Planning-grade by design — outputs are explicitly decision-support for a licensed engineer, which is precisely the posture a firm needs from an automation vendor.

Why your engineers will respect it

We benchmark every release against real, human-engineered as-built FTTH designs — and publish the result, including the misses.
70%of benchmark designs score CONSTRUCTABLE on the C1–C8 buildability audit — graded against real engineers' work, not a synthetic baseline (advisory field check)
97.1%of designs within ±5% on serviceable homes passed vs the engineer-of-record count
±15–20%footage delivered as an AACE estimate band vs the 15–20% human-variance envelope; 11.2% median error, misses skew to conservative overbuilds, every one published with its sign and size

Full methodology, tolerance bands, and the honest misses on the accuracy page.

Run it against a design you've already sealed

Give us a boundary your firm has engineered and judge the package the way you'd judge a new hire's first design — against your own as-built.
Request access → See how it works Talk to us about white-label