Solutions · Municipalities & Utilities

Numbers a council can vote on.
A plan a crew can build.

Municipal broadband programs and utility fiber initiatives answer to boards, councils, ratepayers, and grant agencies. MACRILON gives you a transparent, costed, permit-aware design package — with published accuracy behind every number — in days instead of budget cycles.

What is slowing your build?

Every number gets scrutinized

A feasibility study or grant application lives or dies on its homes-passed count and cost estimate. If those numbers shift after award, the shortfall is a public problem — yours.

Little or no in-house OSP engineering

Most municipalities and utilities don't keep fiber design engineers on staff. Consultant studies take months, cost six figures, and produce a PDF — not a living design you can iterate on as the project scope changes.

Right-of-way and permitting are your daily reality

DOT crossings, railroads, water, and neighboring jurisdictions each add a permit and a timeline. Discovering them after design is how public projects slip.

Procurement needs comparable, defensible bids

Without an independent engineering baseline, you're comparing contractor bids against each other instead of against ground truth.

What MACRILON delivers

  • A planning-grade, costed design for any boundary you draw — full engineering workbook with a line-item bill of materials (labor, conduit, cable, materials, permits), suitable for budget approval, grant applications, and bid benchmarking.
  • Homes passed from authoritative open data — address registries, parcel and building footprints, and federal broadband serviceability data, resolved fresh for your jurisdiction.
  • A permit matrix on day one — every DOT, railroad, water, and boundary crossing identified from authoritative GIS before design review, so the permitting clock starts early.
  • Scenario iteration in days — change the boundary, the phasing, or the standards and get a re-costed package back, instead of re-engaging a study for another quarter.
  • In-browser review for non-specialists — board members and program staff read the plan map and the workbook side by side in a browser; engineers get CAD and GIS exports.

Why you can trust the numbers

We benchmark every release against real, human-engineered as-built FTTH designs — and publish the result, including the misses.
97.1%of benchmark designs land within ±5% on serviceable homes passed vs the engineer-of-record count
70%score CONSTRUCTABLE on the C1–C8 buildability audit — the field check that doesn't need an answer key
±15–20%footage delivered as an AACE estimate band vs the 15–20% human-variance envelope; misses skew to conservative overbuilds (11.2% median error, every one published)

Deliverables are planning-grade and engineer-reviewed — decision support and a head start for your engineer of record, not a substitute for one. Full methodology on the accuracy page.

Bring a boundary. Leave with a plan.

A study area, a grant footprint, or the whole jurisdiction — we'll show you the package on your geography.
Request access → Estimate your savings View a sample design